Imam Sadiq(as) University Quran and Hadith Studies‎ 2008-3211 18 1 2024 09 22 Document and Evidence-Based Analyses of the Narrations Regarding the “Immunity from the Afterlife Account of the Buried and the Deceased in the Haramain” in Imamia Sources Document and Evidence-Based Analyses of the Narrations Regarding the “Immunity from the Afterlife Account of the Buried and the Deceased in the Haramain” in Imamia Sources 105 133 77447 10.30497/qhs.2024.246056.3936 FA Samad Abdollahi Abed Associate Professor of Quran & Hadith Sciences, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran. Mohammad Hossein Naqizadeh PhD Student of Quran & Hadith Sciences, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran; Iran. 0009-0007-7417-8046 Journal Article 2024 03 19 In the narrative books of Imamiyah, there are narrations that prove certain immunities in the Afterlife in terms of punishment and reckoning for the deceased and the buried in the Haramain. Some of these hadiths have called the infidels subject to this ruling also. The conflict of these narrations with the verses and narrations that consider man responsible for his own actions and beliefs and negate any injustice in the account, and their incompatibility with the religious knowledge derived from reason, at least has brought about the hypothesis of the weakness of a part of these narrations; and this has caused the formation of this research based on the documentary and content evaluation of these narrations. According to this research, most of these narrations are weak in terms of documentation; and the apparent themes of some of these narrations are not acceptable due to their conflict with certain religious evidences. Only by interpreting the narrations and deviating from their contexts, an acceptable version of them can be rendered. In the narrative books of Imamiyah, there are narrations that prove certain immunities in the Afterlife in terms of punishment and reckoning for the deceased and the buried in the Haramain. Some of these hadiths have called the infidels subject to this ruling also. The conflict of these narrations with the verses and narrations that consider man responsible for his own actions and beliefs and negate any injustice in the account, and their incompatibility with the religious knowledge derived from reason, at least has brought about the hypothesis of the weakness of a part of these narrations; and this has caused the formation of this research based on the documentary and content evaluation of these narrations. According to this research, most of these narrations are weak in terms of documentation; and the apparent themes of some of these narrations are not acceptable due to their conflict with certain religious evidences. Only by interpreting the narrations and deviating from their contexts, an acceptable version of them can be rendered. https://qhs.isu.ac.ir/article_77447_6edf850f7a8e8ac8677974de97bd26e3.pdf