Bounty of Excellence
In traditional systems, the referees must express their views in writing, in a form or in detail about the articles. To play this role, Sinaub's publications management system has provided dynamic judges with judges and evaluators.
To start the trial, login to the personal page after entering the username and password. From the menu on the left of this page, enter the referee's special page.
There are three options on this page:
New articles submitted for arbitration and you have not yet opened.
Articles that are unfinished in previous appeals, and you can re-open and complete the arbitration process.
Refereed articles, which are just listed, and since you have announced your final comment, you no longer need more work and you can not change the previous comment!
Suppose that a new article has been sent to you. These articles are listed at the top of the page, and next to each item, a proprietary code is inserted. Click this code to open the article specification. By clicking on the article code, you can see the editor's description, article abstract, and the special box for posting your first review.
In the first stage, only you are asked to declare your readiness for arbitration; you can accept or not accept the option. Only after the acceptance is the judgment that you can view the full text of the article and insert its opinion about it in the system. In the management system of Sinawb, the referee can:
Write a special note to the author.
Write a special note to the editor.
Open the dedicated evaluation form and fill it out.
Send an edited file or notes and annotations through the system to the editor. Most evaluators prefer to comment on the margin of the article.
Open the main file of the article using the link on this page and read it. Insert your comment to the editor and author. Insert this comment is optional, but its writing is recommended. Upload the edited file and add your own comments in the form of a text file using the panel. The file will be sent to the editor and the author. This option is also optional. Clicking on the link to the arbitration form will display the articles of the special form of the referee. This form is a multiple choice option.
In the end it is necessary to specify the referee's final opinion in the form of one of the following five options:
Reproducible, partial review for acceptance, general review, non-releasable, can not be judged. Note that this final view of the referee plays a decisive role in the publication of the article.
After submitting the review to the editor, the title of the article will be listed on the page of the reviewed articles. The titles in this list can not be re-judged.
Also, given the length of time that arbitration should be handled, it can be stopped at any stage of the task and, at a later time, continue to do so. To do this, simply select the second option from the referee's dedicated page, the arbitral articles, and complete the unfinished processes.
Reviewers
Review a manuscript is a privilege. However, it is a time-consuming responsibility. Hence, TEJ’s Journal Editorial Board, authors, and audiences appreciate your willingness to accept this responsibility. In so doing, TEJ needs reviewers who can provide helpful comments on submitted manuscripts within the determined period of time by the editor. Maintaining TEJ as a scientific journal of high quality depends on reviewers with a high level of expertise and an ability to be objective, fair, and insightful in their evaluation of manuscripts.
Reviewers’ Responsibilities
If TEJ’s Editor-in-Chief has invited you to review a manuscript, please consider the following:
What Should Be Checked ?