Reviewing and Criticizing Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari's View about Understanding Divine Inspiration

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D student of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Fasa Branch, Department of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Fasa, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Fasa Branch, Department of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Fasa, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch, Department of Islamic Studies, Shiraz, Iran.

Abstract

The issue of inspiration is one of the fundamental issues in Islam, which is faced with two attitudes, earthly and heavenly. The heavenly attitude considers inspiration as a message from God to mankind and considers the Prophet of Islam as the messenger of its communication. But the earthly attitude, which is a product of the modernity period, has different aspects and dimensions. Some modern thinkers such as Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari believe that the inspiration originated from the subconscious mind of the Prophet and came in the form of words in the Quran. Shabestari believes that if the inspiration is the word of God is not understandable by the audience. he cited to the views of linguists and implication of affirmation in the science of principles jurisprudence and its comparison with the Quran and concludes that the Quran is the word of the Prophet. Shabestari considers pre-understanding to be the main element of understanding and considers it to be influenced by time, place and personal interests. With this point of view, understanding is a historical matter. As a result, regardless of whether the Quran is the word of the Prophet or the word of God, he considers it impossible to truly understand the Quran. The purpose of this article is to review and criticize Shabestri's comparative reasons regarding the impossibility of understanding divine inspiration, which he cited the opinions of some linguist philosophers and the principles of jurisprudence in this context. The flaws in his arguments in the discussed field have been clarified and explained in a new method. In the present article, the philosophical definition of language, the possibility of understanding divine inspiration and the implication of affirmation from Shabestari's point of view were analyzed with analytical-critical method and it was proved by rational and narrative criteria that he has presented a wrong understanding of the definitions of linguists and the issue of understanding and the implication of affirmation. And with presuppositions and illogical reasoning method, it has achieved false results. Therefore, the cases cited by Shabestari do not indicate the impossibility of understanding God's inspiration.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

The Holy Qur'an.
Nahj al-Balaghe
AbdolaHipour, Mahdi; Shiroudi, Morteza; Aghili, Faraj Khalil. (1401AH). "Why the way of understanding and rational understanding is the basis in the interpretation of the Quran". Quarterly Scientific Research Journal of Quran and Hadith Sciences. No53. 218-189.
Dehkhoda, Ali Akbar. (1931AH). Dehkhoda dictionary. Tehran.
Feyz, Alireza. (1395SH). Fundamentals of jurisprudence and principles. Tehran. Tehran University.
Helli, Hassan. (1410AH). Al- javaher Al-nazid. Qom. Bidar.
Hosseini-Astrabadi, Sharafuddin. (1409AH.), Taweel interpretation of the verses in the virtues of al-atrah al-tahirah. Qom. Society of teachers.
IbnSina, Hossein. (1375SH). Al-Asharat and Al-Tanbihat, Al-Sharh by al-Mohaqeq al-Tousi. Qom. Balaghe.
IbnSina, Hossein. (1405AH). Al-shefa. By the efforts of Ibrahim Madkour. Qom. library of Ayatollah Marashi Najafi.
Jamali, Ahmed. (2016). "Examining and criticizing the attitude of the human nature of the Quran and the non-eternity of its rulings". Maarej Science and Commentary Magazine. Volume3, 119-148.
Javadi Amoli, Abdullah. (1378SH). Thematic interpretation of the Holy Quran. Qom. Esra.
Khansari, Mohammad. (1373SH). Formal logic. Tehran. agah.
Khoei, Abolqasem. (1410AH). Al- mohazerat on principles of jurisprudence. Qom. Ansarian.
Lankarani, Mohammad Fazel. (1380SH). Izah Al-kefayah explanation. Written by Mohammad Hosseini Qomi. Qom Library.
Malekshahi, Hassan. (1367AH), Taftazani's translation and interpretation of Tahzeeb al-Mujq. Tehran. University of Tehran.
Mesbah Yazdi, Mohammad Taghi. (1377SH). Education of ideas. Tehran, Islamic Propaganda Organization.
Mohammadi Rayshahri, Mohammad. (2014). The amount of wisdom. Qom. Dar al-Hadith
Mohammadzadeh, Reza, (1374SH), "An explanation of informal fallacies". Religion and Communication. No2. 31-50.
Mojtahed Shabestari, Mohammad, (1387SH). "Prophetic reading from the world 1". Available at: cgie.org.ir/fa/news/2427, electronic content.
Mojtahed Shabestari, Mohammad. (1379A). Hermeneutics of the book and
Mojtahed Shabestari, Mohammad. (1379b). A critique on the official reading of religion. Tehran. new design.
Mozaffar, Mohammad Reza. (1437AH). Logic. Qom. Qom Seminary.
Montazeri Moghadam, Mahmoud. (1397SH). Knowledge of logic. Qom. Management center of seminaries.
Nderlo, BeitElah. (1390SH). "Wittgenstein's theory of language games, a postmodern philosophical perspective on language". Database of fundamental western studies journals. period1.
Sabzevari, AbdulAli. (1393SH). Tahzib Al-osul Qom. Tebyan Cultural and Information Institute.
Sadr, Mohammad Baqer. (1429AH). Lessons in fundamentals. Qom. Darul Sadr
Shakerin, HamidReza. (1394SH). "Humanization of the Holy Quran based on speech acts". cash book magazine. No74 and75. 115-136.
Sharifi, Ahmad Hossein. (1394SH). "Divinity of the language of the Quran and the problem of understanding", theological knowledge. Period1. 78-100.
Shirazi, Qutbeddin. Description hekmat Al-eshragh. Lithography. No date. out of place. Anonymous.
Tusi, Nasiroddin. (1326SH). Asas Al-eghtebas. corrected by Modares Razavi. Tehran. Tehran University.
Gahramani, Masoumeh. Behzadi, Mohammad Hassan. (1395SH). "A review of the concept of assumption and hypothesis". Payam Noor University Statistics Department. Tehran.
Walton, D.N, (1991AH). informal logic. New York. Cambridge university.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics