Dating the Traditions about the Prophet’s Mistake in Prayer and Analysis the Social-Political Situation of Fabricating and Spreading these Traditions

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 PhD in Quran and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Quranic and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

10.30497/qhs.2024.244598.3780

Abstract

In the narrative sources, both sunnis and shiis, there are narrations about the Prophet’s mistake in prayer. These traditions have been transmitted with different matns and Isnads. Most of the shia scholars citing several reasons have considered these traditions fabricated. In this article, using two methods of dating hadiths (Isnad analysis, Isnad-matn analysis) the historical and geographical origins of these traditions have been determined then in the second step using the conclusions of the first step, social-political situation of fabricating and spreading these traditions have been analysed.  The findings show that these narrations were initially forged by Abū Huraira and published in Medina to justify the caliphs’ mistakes in the prayer. Then some intentional or unintentional changes have been made by some of the transmitters of the next generations. It is worth noting that in the Ibn Sirin’s recension it is emphasized that the two first caliphs witnessed the incident. The aim of this emphasize might be making some virtues for the two first caliphs. In the narrations attributed to Ibn Mas'ud, with the fabricated isnads the Prophet’s mistake has been justified by the emphasize on this issue that the prophet is one of humankind. The aim of this recension could be responding to the prevelant belief among Shia in Kufa that the prophet is immune from any mistake.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

The Holy Qur'an.
Ibn Abī Al-Ḥadīd ʿAḤBH(nd), Sharḥ Nahju Al-Balāgha Ibn Abī Al-Ḥadīd. ed: Moḥammad AA. Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Kutub al-ʿArabī, nd.
Ibn Abī Ḥātim ʿAR. (1951), al-Jarḥ wat-taʿadīl. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ at-Turāth al-ʿArabī.
Ibn Abī Shayba A.(1988), al-muṣannaf. ed: Al-liḥām S. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Ibn Abi ʿĀ ͗ṣim ABʿA. (1992), as-Sunnah, ed: Mohammad Naṣir al-Dīn Albānī, Beirut: Al-maktabat al-Islāmīa.
Ibn Ḥazm ʿABA, Almaḥalī bi al-Āthār, ed: Aḥmad Moḥammad Shākir, Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, nd.
Ibn al-Ḥanbal A, al-Musnad, Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, nd.
Ibn Saʿd M, aT-Ṭabaqāt al-kubrā. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir; nd.
Ibn ʿAsākir ʿAli, (1994), Tārīkh Madīnih Damishq.ed: Shiri A. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Ibn Qutaibah Dīnivarī ʿABM, (1992), al-Amāmah wa as-Sīāsah. Ed. ʿAli Shiri. Qum: Intishārāt   as-Sharīf Raḍī.
Ibn Mājah MBY, as-Sunan, ed. Moḥammad Fuʾād ʿAbdu al-Bāqī, Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Abū Rayya M. Shiykh al-Muḍīrah. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-A ͗ʿalamī li-l-Maṭbūʿaāt.
Atslandr, Piter, (1992), Rawish hay Tajrubī Tahqīq Ijtimāʿaī. Transl. by: Kāẓim Zādih B, Tehrān:Intishārāt Āstān Quds.
Bukhārī ABA, (1980), aṢ-Ṣaḥiḥ, Dār al-Fikr.
Balādhurī ABY, (1959), Ansāb al-Ashrāf. ed. Humaydu Allāh m. Egypt: Dār al-Maʿārif.
Tirmidhī, MBʿĪ, (1982), aS-Sunan. ed. Muḥammad ʿAʿA. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Jaṣāṣ ABʿA, (1994), Aḥkām al-Qurān, Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿAlmīa.
Ḥillī ḤBY, (1995), Tadhkirat al-Fuqahā, Qum: Muʾassasat Āl al-Biyt li Iḥyāʾ at-Turāth.
Khaṭīb Baghdāī ABʿA, (1996), Tārīkh Baghdād, ed: Muṣṭafā ʿAbd al-qādir, Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿAlmīa.
Sharafu aD-Dīn ʿAH. Abū Huraira. Qum: Muʾassasat al-A ͗nṣārīān li-ṭ-Ṭibāʿa wa-n-Nashr; nd.
Shāfi ͨ ī MBA, (1982), Alaum, Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Shiri, Marjan; Nilsaz, Nosrat, (2022), Dating the Traditions of Prophet’s First Revelation in Sunni Collections, Quran and Hadith Studies, vol15, no2, summer.
 Ṣanʿanī ʿARBH, al-Muṣannaf, ed: Aʿẓami HR. Manshūrāt al-majls  al-ʿalmī.
Ṭabarānī SBA. Almuʿajam al-Kabīr. ed. Salfī HʿAM. Dār Iḥyāʾ at-Turāth al-ʿArabī; nd.
Ṭabarī Amoli, Mohammad (1994), Al-Mostarshad, Qom: Koshanpor.
Ṭaḥāwī ABM, (1995), Sharḥ Maʿānī al- Āthār, ed: Muhammad Zuhrī Najār, Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿAlmīa.
Ṭūsī, MBḤ, al-Khalāf, (1986), Qum: Muʾassasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī at-tābiʿah li-Jamāʿatu al-Mudarisīn.
Ṭūsī, MBḤ, Tahdhīb al-Aḥkām, ed: Ḥasan Kharsān, Dār al- Kutub­ al-Islāmīa.
ʿAāmeli, Jaʿafar Mortezā, (2006), Al-Sahih men Sirat Al-nabi Al-ʿAzam, Qom: Dār Al-Hadith.
ʿAjlī, ABʿA, (1984), Maʿrifat al-Thuqāt, Madīna: Maktabat ad-Dār.
ʿAskarī Mortezā, (1996), al-Qurān al-Karīm wa Riwāīāt al-Madrisatayn, Beirut: Shirkat al-Tuḥīd l-Nashr.
ʿAynī, Badr ad-Dīn, ͨ Umdat al-Qārī, Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ at-Turāth al-ʿArabī.
Kulaynī MBY, (1984), Al-Kāfi, ed: Ghaffāri ʿAA. 4th p. Tehrān: Dār al- Kutub­ al-Islāmīa; 1362 SH.
Kīvī R/Kāmpenhūd L, (1994), Rawish Tahqīq dar ʿAulūm Ijtimāʿaī. Transl. by: Nik Gohar ʿAH. 4th p. Tehrān: Farhang Muʿāṣir.
Majlisī, Mohammad Bāqir, (1985), Mulāthir al-ʾAkhiār fi Fahm Tahdhīb al-ʾAkhbār, Qom: Maktaba  Āiat Allah Mirʿashī.
Mudarisī Ṭabāṭabāyī H. (2007), Mīrāth Maktub Shiʿa az sih Qarn Nukhustīn Hijrī, translation: Rasul Jaʿfarīān/ʿAlī Qurāyī, Qom.
Mizzī JD (1985), Tahdhīb al-Kamāl. ed. Maʿaruf BʿA. Beirut: Muʾassasat ar-Risāla.
Masʿaūdī Ali, (1983), Murawaj aDh-Dhahab wa Maʿādin al-Jūhar.ed. ʿAbd al-Humayd MMD. Beirut: al-Maktabat al-Islāmīa.
Muslim ibn Ḥajjāj, aṢ -Ṣaḥīḥ, Beirut: Dār al-Fikr; nd.
Mufīd MBMBN, (1993), ʿAdam Sahw an-Nabī,Beirut: Dār al-Mufīd;
Motzki Harald (2015), ‘Muṭāliʿāt Hadīthī bih Kujā Mī rawad?’, Tārīkh gudhārī Hadīth; Rawish hā wa Nimunih hā. ed. Āqāyī ʿA. Tehrān: Ḥikmat.
Motzki,Harald, (2001),“The Collection of the Quran:A Reconsideration of Western Views in Light of Recent Methodologocal Development”,Der Islam.
Nasāʾī, ABSH, (1929), aS-Sunan al-Kubrā, Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Nawawī, MDBSH,  Almajmu ͨ ,Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Hūlistī UĀ, (1994), Taḥlīl Muḥtawā dar ʿAulūm Ijtimāʿaī wa Insānī. Transl. by: Sālār zādih Amīrī N. Tehrān:Intishārāt Dānishgāh ʿAllāmih Ṭabāṭabāyī.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics