Dating Reports on Ibn Masʿūd’s Reaction to the Compilation of the Qurʾān under ʿUthmān

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 PhD in Quran and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
10.30497/qhs.2026.247984.4115
Abstract
Reports concerning ʿAbd Allāh b. Masʿūd’s to the appointment of Zayd b. Thābit for the compilation of the Qurʾān during the caliphate of ʿUthmān, as well as his refusal to surrender his personal codex (muṣḥaf), have been transmitted through diverse chains (ṭuruq) and textual versions in Sunni ḥadīth and historical sources. This study employs multiple methods of ḥadīth dating, including isnād analysis and combined isnād–textual analysis, in order to reconstruct the historical and geographical origins of these reports and trace their gradual development over time. The findings of the isnād analysis indicate that Ibn Masʿūd functions as the common pivotal transmitter across these reports, with at least seven transmitters reporting from him. The tradition appears to have originated and circulated in Kūfa before 30 AH, later spreading to Baṣra through subsequent generations. Key secondary common links that played a significant role in its transmission include Abū Isḥāq al-Sabīʿī, al-Aʿmash—both Kūfan transmitters—and Ibrāhīm b. Saʿd from Medina. The results of the isnād–textual analysis show that all versions consistently emphasize Ibn Masʿūd’s elevated status during the lifetime of the Prophet and describe Zayd b. Thābit as a young man (with two locks of hair, “dhūʾābatān”), a detail often interpreted as an allusion to his Jewish background. All versions also include Ibn Masʿūd’s refusal to hand over his codex and his encouragement of the Kūfans to follow his stance. In the recension of Shaqīq b. Salamah, an additional claim appears asserting Ibn Masʿūd’s superiority in Qurʾānic knowledge. In the transmissions of Ibrāhīm b. Saʿd, however, the reference to dhūʾābatān is omitted, while a new element expressing Ibn Masʿūd’s resentment at being excluded from the official codification process is introduced.
Keywords
Subjects

The Holy Qur’ān.    
ʿAāmeli, JM. (1989), Ḥaqāʾq Hāma Ḥawl al-Qurʾān al-Karīm. Qum: Muʾassasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī. (In Arabic)
ʿAskarī M. (1999). al-Qurān al-Karīm wa Riwāīāt al-Madrisatayn, Tehrān: Majma ͨ Islāmī. (In Arabic)
Atslandr P. (1992). Rawish hay Tajrubī Tahqīq Ijtimāʿaī. Transl. by: Kāẓim Zādih B. Tehrān:Intishārāt Āstān Quds. (In Arabic)
Balādhurī ABY.(1956). Futūḥ al-Baldān.r ed. Ṣalāḥu ad-Dīn Munjad. Cairo: Maktabat Lijanat al-Bayān al-ʿArabī. (In Arabic)
Balādhurī ABY.(1959). Ansāb al-Ashrāf. ed. Humaydu Allāh m. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif. (In Arabic)
Bāqilānī A. (2001). Al-Intiṣār li-LQurʾān. ed. Mohammad Quḍāh. Beirut: Dār al-Fatḥ. (In Arabic)
Bayhaqī, A. (1989). Shuʿabu al-Īmān. ed. Mohammad Sa ͨ īd Zaghlul. Beirut: Dār al- Kutub al-ʿAlmīa. (In Arabic)
Bukhārī ABA. (1980). aṢ-Ṣaḥiḥ, Dār al-Fikr. (In Arabic)
Bukhārī ABA. (nd). At-Tārīkh al-Kabīr. Turkey: al-Maktabat al-Islāmīa. (In Arabic)
Faḍl Ibn Shādhān F. (1984). al-Īḍāḥ. ed. Ḥusiynī SJ. Tehran: University Publishing and Printing Institution (In Arabic)
Holsty, L.R (1994). Content analysis in the social sciences and humanities. Transl. by: Sālār zādih Amīrī N. Tehrān:Intishārāt Dānishgāh ʿAllāmih Ṭabāṭabāyī. (In Persian)
Ibn Abi ʿĀ ͗ṣim ABʿA. (1992), as-Sunnah, ed: Mohammad Naṣir al-Dīn Albānī, Beirut: Al-maktabat al-Islāmīa(In Arabic).
Ibn Abī al-Ḥadīd ʿ. (nd). Sharḥ Nahju Al-Balāgha Ibn Abī Al-Ḥadīd. ed. Moḥammad AA. Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Kutub al-ʿArabī. (In Arabic)
Ibn Abī Dāwūd A. (2002). al-Maṣāḥif. Cairo: al-Fāruq al-ḥaditha l-lṭabā ͨa wa al-nashr. (In Arabic)
Ibn Abī Shayba A. (1988), al-muṣannaf. ed: Al-liḥām S. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. (In Arabic)
Ibn al-Ḥanbal A. (nd), al-Musnad, Beirut: Dār Ṣādir. (In Arabic)
Ibn Athīr ABM. (1966), al-kāmil fī at-Tārīkh, Beirut: Dār Ṣādir. (In Arabic)
Ibn Khaldūn A. (nd), Tārīkh Ibn Khaldūn, Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ at-Turāth al-ʿArabī. (In Arabic)
Ibn Manẓūr MBM. (1993). Lisānu al-ʿArab. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir. (In Arabic)
Ibn Saʿd M. (nd). al-Ṭabaqāt al-kubrā. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir. (In Arabic)
Ibn Shabba A. (1989), Tārīkh al-Madīna. ed: Fahīm Shaltut. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. (In Arabic)
Ibn Wahb, ʿA. (2003). Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. ed. Miklos Muranyi, Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī. (In Arabic)
Korāni A. (2008), Tadwīn al-Qurʾān. Qum: Dār al-Qurʾān al-Karīm. (In Arabic)
Maʿrifat MH. (2012). Tafsīr wa al-Mufasirān. Qum: Intishārāt Dhawi al-Qurbā.(In Persian)
Mizzī JD. (1985). Tahdhīb al-Kamāl. ed. Maʿaruf BʿA. Beirut: Muʾassasat ar-Risāla. (In Arabic)
Motzki, Harald. (2001). “The Collection of the Quran: A Reconsideration of Western Views in Light of Recent Methodologocal Development”, Haft Āsimān. ed. Karīmī Nīā M. N: 32. Winter. (In Persian)
Motzki, Harald. (2005). “Dating Muslim Traditions: A Survey”, Arabica, LII, 2, 2005, pp. 204-253.
Motzki, Harald. (2009). “Whither  Ḥadīth Studies?”, Analysing Muslim Traditions, Volume: 78, pp. 47–124.
Mudarisī Ṭabāṭabāyī H. (2001). »Examining the long-standing disputes over the distortion of the Quran« Haft Āsimān. N: 11. (In Persian)
Muntaẓirī HA. (1994). Nahāyat al-ʾUṣūl: Speeches for discussion of late Ayatollah: Al-Hajj Agha Hossein al-Tabatabayi al-Barujardi. Tehrān: Nashr al-Fikr. (In Arabic)
Mūṣilī A. (1991). al-Musnad. ed. Husiyn Salīm Asad. Damascus: Dār al-Maʾmūn lt-Turāth. (In Arabic)
Naḥās A. (1988). Ma ͨ ānī al-Qurʾān. ed. Muḥammad Ali Ṣābunī. Makih: Jāmiʿih Um al-Qurā.(In Arabic)
Nasāʾī, ABSH, (1929), aS-Sunan al-Kubrā, Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. (In Arabic)
Noldeke, Theodor/ Schwally, Friedrich. (2004). History of Qurʾān. Translated by: George Timer. Beirut: Dār al-nashr.
Qāsim Ibn Salām Q. (1995). Faʾl al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār Ibn Kathīr. (In Arabic)
Quivy, Reymond. (1994). Research Methodology in Social Sciences. Transl. by: Nik Gohar ʿAH. 4th p. Tehrān: Farhang Muʿāṣir. (In Persian)
Sajistānī A. (1989). al-Sunnan. ed. Saʿīd Muḥammad Liḥām. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. (In Arabic)
Schacht, Joseph. (1979). The origins of Muḥammadan Jurisprudence, Oxford University press, Great Britain.
Shiri, Marjan; Nilsaz, Nosrat. (2024).Dating the Traditions about the Prophet’s Mistake in Prayer and Analysis the Social-Political Situation of Fabricating and Spreading these Tradition”, Quran and Hadith Studies. Vol. 17. No. 2. (In Persian)
Soiuti J. (1995). al-Itqān  fi ͨ Ulūm al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. (In Arabic)
Soiuti J. (nd). al-Dur al-Manthūr fi al-Tafsīr bil-Manthūr. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifa. (In Arabic)
Ṭabarī, MBJ. (nd). al-Tārīkh. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-A ͗ʿalamī li-l-Maṭbūʿaāt. (In Arabic)
Ṭabarī, MBJ.(1995). Jāmiʿ al-bayān ʿan taʾwīl āy al-Qurʾān. ed. Ṣidqī Jamīl al-ʿAṭṭār, Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. (In Arabic)
Ṭālib M. (1990). How to do social studies. Tehrān: Intishārāt Amīr Kabīr. (In Persian)
Ṭayālisī SBD. (nd). al-Musnad, Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifa. (In Arabic)
Tirmidhī, MBʿĪ. (1982). al-Sunan. ed. Muḥammad ʿAʿA. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. (In Arabic)
Zarkishī B. (1956). al-Burhān fī  ͨUlūm al-Qurʾān. ed. Moḥammad AA. Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Kutub al-ʿArabī. (In Arabic)